- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
This week, Star Wars creator George Lucas commenced litigation in the UK against British movie prop designer Andrew Ainsworth, seeking to enforce a $20 million California judgment against Ainsworth for trademark and copyright infringement. Lucas’ claim of infringement centered on Ainworth’s unlicensed sale of Stormtrooper uniform and helmet reproductions on his personal design studio website.
Ainsworth is allegedly the original designer of the Stormtrooper uniforms featured in the 1977 sci-fi classic Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope. He claims to have personally sculpted the molds from which the original helmets and body armor were constructed. The iconic Stormtrooper has since become a symbol of the Star Wars movie franchise:
Ainsworth’s molds for the Stormtrooper helmets and uniforms were first inspired by the conceptual drawings of Ralph McQuarrie. McQuarrie produced the conceptual art for all three original Star Wars movies.
Most important to the resolution of the Lucas-Ainsworth controversy will be the London High Court’s determination of who owns the intellectual property rights in the three-dimensional Stormtrooper outfit.
Questions relevant to the determination of authorship (and ownership) of the Stormtrooper copyrights (in the parlance of U.S. Copyright Act of 1976) are: whether Lucasfilms and Ainsworth were joint authors of the Stormtrooper uniform; whether Ainsworth was an employee or an independent contractor of Lucasfilms when he created the uniform; and thus whether the Stormtrooper uniform was a “work for hire”. Copyright law in the United Kingdom is similar enough to that of the United States such that the London court’s reasoning should closely follow the California decision.
— Austin Broussard
Recent Blog Posts
- Obama Weighs in on Net Neutrality
- Music Streaming & the Music Industry: Everything has Changed
- If #AlexfromTarget Heads to Court
- Online Voting – The Wave of the Future?
- Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act Necessary, or License for Willful Blindness?
- Shock Technology and Legal, Compulsory Behavior Modification
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution