- Journal Archives
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Most people have to hire a private investigator if they want photo evidence of their spouse cheating. Not so for Rosetta Millington. Ms. Millington has been married to actor Balthazar Getty since May 2000. The couple has four children, the youngest of whom is 9 months old. Not only was Ms. Millington’s evidence of her husband’s affair free, it was extremely public. Paparazzi photos of Mr. Getty frolicking with a nude Sienna Miller were published this month by a British newspaper. Ms. Miller isn’t happy and she’s suing the newspaper for publishing the photos, claiming breach of privacy.
Likewise, Brad Pitt is reportedly threatening to sue some paparazzi over photos taken of him, Angelina Jolie, and their children while the children played in the backyard. Mr. Pitt’s attorneys assert that the paparazzi violated the family’s “reasonable” expectation of privacy by employing high-tech lenses to snap the shots.
But, just what exactly is reasonable when you’re a couple reportedly shopping their newborns’ photos around to see which tabloid is the highest bidder? The price is said to be somewhere around $15 million. Does your backyard become a “no-picture” zone? Even when your children are part of the reason you’re in the public eye? Asking a judge to discern what is a reasonable expectation of privacy and what isn’t, sounds like asking the judge to decide the nature of modern-day celebrity.
The offending photos of the Jolie-Pitts are published in the most recent issue of InTouch Weekly.
- Blair Lazarus
Recent Blog Posts
- Revolution or Ruse: Wu-Tang Clan’s 88-Year Hold on the Commercial Release of Once Upon a Time in Shaolin
- Harper Lee’s Real Estate Attorney Becomes Her Literary Agent
- FAA’s Launches Proposed Rule for Commercial Drones
- Heirs to Hawaii Five-0 Theme Allege Copyright Infringement
- Cell Phones, Privacy and the Unclear Scope of the Fourth Amendment
- Safety First: String of Sexual Attacks by Ride-Sharing Drivers Prompts Congressional Action
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution