- Journal Archives
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
There is no escaping publicity when you’re in the NFL. In addition to coverage of their athletic accomplishments, NFL players make the news for a variety of less laudatory reasons. From illegal dog fighting rings to self-inflicted gunshot wounds, NFL celebrities frequently make headlines. Unfortunately, the bad behavior of a few may reflect on the league as a whole, perhaps directly affecting league revenue.
The Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law is proud to present the following abstract from its Fall 2008 issue (Vol. 11 No.1):
The National Football League (NFL) is considered to be the premier professional sports league in the United States, if not the world. In order to maintain that prominence, it is necessary for the NFL to address circumstances that may arise periodically that could have a deleterious effect on league revenues. Throughout the history of the NFL, initiatives taken to safeguard its continued prosperity have been within the province of the NFL Commissioner. The behavior of NFL players, whether on the playing field or in their personal lives, presents one such threat to the league’s financial success. In the area of player discipline, the Commissioner has the authority to punish players for “conduct detrimental to the integrity, or public confidence in, the game of professional football.” It was under this authority that the current NFL Commissioner, Roger Goodell, enacted a new personal conduct policy to be applied to all employees of the NFL. While the previous policy required a conviction or its equivalent before discipline was imposed for conduct occurring away from the playing field, the new policy disposes of this requirement and empowers the Commissioner to punish “[c]onduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity and reputation of the NFL, NFL Clubs, or NFL players.”
This Note first examines the relevant provisions of the NFL’s revised personal conduct policy and the reactions to its implementation. It then considers the history of the office of NFL Commissioner, the league documents establishing the scope of his authority, and the treatment of commissioner authority in other professional sports leagues. Finally, this Note evaluates the new professional conduct policy in relation to the scope of the authority granted to the NFL Commissioner and offers a solution capable of alleviating the problems posed by the scope and application of the policy.
Note Author: Michael A. Mahone, Jr.
Recent Blog Posts
- Neiman Marcus Shoppers Suffer Financial Injuries! Possibly
- Facebook Gears up for Trademark Fight With Brazilian Competitor
- Draft Kings: A fantasy sports betting website valued close to $1 Billion
- Are Design Patents Really a Wise Investment Now?
- The Door Left Ajar: Navigating the Patent-Antitrust Paradox in Light of King Drug Co. v. GlaxoSmithKline
- Will Feds Preempt Tougher State Data Breach Laws?
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution