- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
In the first round of the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament last year, the Hilltoppers of Western Kentucky, a 12 seed, took on the Bulldogs of Drake University, a 5 seed. Western Kentucky’s Ty Rogers hit a three-point buzzer-beater in overtime to upset Drake. I watched the game in a local sports bar, where the lone Hilltopper fan ran yelling through the bar, out the door and into the middle of the street. No doubt, sports fans take the tournament seriously. For some, it’s enough to watch two days of great basketball and revel in the inevitable upsets. But for others, there is big money on the line.
It is tournament time again. From the moment the tournament bracket was released on Selection Sunday until tip off in the opening game on Tuesday, sports fans across the nation will make their picks and will lock in their brackets. Even non-sports fans will fill out a bracket in hopes of winning the office pool. But aren’t all these people breaking the law? The short answer is yes. NCAA tournament pools are a form of illegal gambling in most states. However, some states allow gambling on the tournament. For example, Vermont allows tournament pools so long as the winner takes all (i.e. the organizer does not take a cut of the money). Other states have similar de minimis exceptions.
If you have already thrown $5 into your office pool, you can take comfort in the fact that no one seems to have been prosecuted for an office pool before. Apparently law enforcement has bigger fish to fry. So long as the pool stays small and the organizer does not take a cut of the money, you probably will not find yourself spending time in jail.
Recent Blog Posts
- Obama’s Cybersecurity Executive Order: Private Sector Must Help Police the “Wild West”
- Qualcomm Settlement May Reconfigure the Smartphone Market in China
- Who Rightfully Owns the Village People’s YMCA?
- Internet Elections Regulation: Another Pie in the Partisan Food Fight?
- Great Artists Steal? A Music Theory Thought Experiment & a Worry about the Litigation of Popular Music
- What to Expect After Teva v. Sandoz?
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution