- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Following in the footsteps of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Copyright Office is now facing long delays and mounting backlogs in its attempts to keep up with the flood of new applications for copyright registration. This backlog has prolonged the wait time for applicants to have their registration processed from 6 to 18 months, and unsurprisingly, there are a number of upset applicants.
Ironically, this backlog seems to stem from the implementation of a new $52 million electronic processing system that was supposed to speed up the process of registration. One source of the problem is the electronic system itself–it is slow and unreliable, and the staff members have to be trained to use the new system. However, a larger problem, according to the employees of the office, is the applicants’ use of paper applications rather than electronic ones, as about 45 percent of the applications are still in paper form.
The processing of paper applications is tedious and time-consuming for the office because staff members must manually input the information into the electronic system, and the time that is given to dealing with the paper applications is time taken away from processing the electronic applications.
As a partial solution to this dilemma, the Copyright Office has announced that effective August 1, it will be increasing the fees for paper applications to $65 from $45 while maintaining the electronic filing fee at $35.
Though copyright registration is not necessary to garner copyright protection, it is necessary in order to sue someone for copyright infringement and to gain a number of other benefits. Most of the big companies will not face any problems on this front because they can afford to pay the $685 fee expediting the handling of registration. However, individuals without those types of resources that are applying for registration will undoubtedly continue to be frustrated by the backlog until this problem can be resolved.
– Christine You
Recent Blog Posts
- First Circuit Aligns With Third: Actavis Extends Beyond Cash Settlements
- Current Issues in Technology Law: Dr. Asma Vranaki Analyzes Data Privacy Regulation in the Context of Facebook Advertisements
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Rises in National Law Journal Rankings
- Dancing Babies: The Ninth Circuit May Have Protected Them from Computer Algorithms
- Starbucks’ Next Top Model: It Could Be You
- The Official Legal Showdown: Protecting Street Art, Wynwood Art District as a Case Study, Part 2
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution