- Journal Archives
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
United States Senators, Facebook users, and consumer advocate groups are rallying against recent changes to Facebook’s privacy settings. Recently, four Senators asked the Federal Trade Commission to make privacy guidelines clearer for all social networking sites, while the consumer protection group, The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), filed a complaint with the regulatory agency alleging that Facebook engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices, and violated consumer protection laws.
The counterargument, of course, is that no one is required to use Facebook. Others argue that Facebook’s new policies are no different than policies that other websites use; people are willing to sacrifice privacy for the convenience of the Internet. Although these arguments are valid, Facebook’s situation is different than that of other websites. Facebook branded itself as a social networking site where privacy was paramount, leading some critics to compare the site’s eroding privacy controls to bait and switch advertising. The people who helped Facebook reach its popular status are the same people who are alienated and upset with the site’s new privacy settings. At the same time, however, people have come to rely on Facebook as a primary method of communication and are reluctant to leave the site. Unfortunately, it appears that our only options will be to accept lower privacy standards or to leave Facebook altogether.
– Kate Kliebert
Tagged with: advertising • career • consumer advocate • consumer protection • contracts • courts • creative content • criminal law • Electronic Privacy Information Center • entertainment • EPIC • Facebook • financial • FTC • internet • JETLaw • lawsuits • legislation • media • privacy • progress • publicity rights • senators • social networking • technology • telecommunications • U.S. Constitution
Recent Blog Posts
- Neiman Marcus Shoppers Suffer Financial Injuries! Possibly
- Facebook Gears up for Trademark Fight With Brazilian Competitor
- Draft Kings: A fantasy sports betting website valued close to $1 Billion
- Are Design Patents Really a Wise Investment Now?
- The Door Left Ajar: Navigating the Patent-Antitrust Paradox in Light of King Drug Co. v. GlaxoSmithKline
- Will Feds Preempt Tougher State Data Breach Laws?
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution