- Journal Archives
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
New York is one of the few states where ticket scalping is perfectly legal, or at least was legal until this month. As the state that boasts Broadway, Madison Square Garden, and 30 Rockefeller Plaza, among countless other entertainment venues, New York is the perfect laboratory for this controversial approach to ticket sales.
For many years anti-scalping laws were considered necessary to protect consumers from spending exorbitant amounts of money on tickets. Over time, however, this paternalism faded, and the public consensus came to be that the government should not prohibit a person from spending $7,000 to see a basketball game, if that person is willing and able.
In 2007, New York passed a law that eliminated price caps on the resale of tickets. Proponents of the law hoped that the law would lower ticket prices by bringing the black market into the public forum. Opponents, however, worried the law would drive up ticket prices by granting scalpers free reign.
This month, the law lapsed while the New York legislature debated a new and improved version of the law. The holdup in negotiations is Ticketmaster’s paperless ticketing technology. For certain events, Ticketmaster requires the original broker to show identification before entering. Where paperless ticketing is used, resales of Ticketmaster tickets are impossible except on Ticketmaster’s own exchanges.
The legislature has hesitated to vote on any bill until they have addressed paperless ticketing. New York Governor David Paterson has demanded that Ticketmaster give New Yorkers a paper ticketing option, but so far Ticketmaster has ignored his request.
Proponents of paperless ticketing argue that it provides more security for consumers and more control for artists and companies that use the paperless technology, like Ticketmaster. Other Ticketing companies respond that paperless ticketing hurts consumers because it makes resale virtually impossible.
Both sides of the debate have reasonable arguments for promoting consumerism. Until New York maintains its experimental pro-scalping law for a few years, however, it will not be clear just what the impact of such a law could be on ticket sales. Hopefully, New York will keep its scalping law, if only so that the country can see how this type of ticket-selling environment could impact the entertainment industry, for better or for worse.
– Anne Goodwyn
Tagged with: 30 Rockefeller Plaza • advertising • anti-scalping • Box office • Broadway • courts • entertainment • financial • games • government • JETLaw • law • lawsuits • legislation • media • music • New York • paperless ticketing • privacy • progress • Scalping • sports • ticket sales • Ticketmaster
Recent Blog Posts
- Facebook Gears up for Trademark Fight With Brazilian Competitor
- Draft Kings: A fantasy sports betting website valued close to $1 Billion
- Are Design Patents Really a Wise Investment Now?
- The Door Left Ajar: Navigating the Patent-Antitrust Paradox in Light of King Drug Co. v. GlaxoSmithKline
- Will Feds Preempt Tougher State Data Breach Laws?
- Commercial Drones in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Regulatory Incubator
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution