- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Federal Trade Commission opens investigation into whether Apple is using its position in the market to harm competitors.
DNA introduced to bolster thirty-year old murder charges in Atlanta killings.
Vince Young facing issues off the field for misdemeanor assault and involvement in altercation in Dallas strip club.
AT&T discloses that hole in web security released private information of hundreds of thousands of iPad users.
Illinois judge sues Fox News for $7 million for losing his job after the network aired an erroneous report.
Security risks escalate as cyberterrorists use World Cup emails as a smokescreen to get users to open malicious files.
Big victory for Barry Bonds as appeals court determines evidence government says would prove he lied about steroid use is inadmissible.
Damages now question after New York Judge ruled P2P network LimeWire committed a “substantial amount of copyright infringement.”
Dead celebrities still bring in substantial income from exploitation of publicity rights, spawning lawsuits by potential heirs for the money.
Sixth Circuit finds for Victoria Secret in trademark case, holding the name “Victor’s Little Secret” constitutes infringement.
Tagged with: advertising • Apple • assault • AT&T • celebrities • contracts • copyright • courts • creative content • criminal law • DNA • energy • entertainment • film/television • financial • Fox News • FTC • games • government • intellectual property • internet • iPad • JETLaw • lawsuits • legislation • Limewire • media • medicine • murder • music • patents • privacy • progress • publicity rights • radio • security • Sixth Circuit • sports • technology • telecommunications • trademarks • U.S. Constitution • Victor's Little Secret • Victoria Secret • Vince Young • World Cup
Recent Blog Posts
- Former Cardinals Executive Pleads Guilty to Hacking, But Will the Cardinals Pay the Price?
- Making a Murder – Technology in Forensic Evidence Questioned
- Is “smart gun” technology the future of gun safety?
- Why High-Profile Athletes’ Defamation Lawsuits Against Al Jazeera Are Nothing More Than a Hail Mary
- Executives of a Chinese Online Video-Sharing Service Provider Stood Trial for Internet Pornography
- The Rise of ‘Swatting’
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution