- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Attorneys General from approximately thirty states are discussing whether Google violated any laws when cars used by the company to snap pictures for the Street View service also collected personal information sent over a number of unsecured wireless networks. Last Thursday, Attorneys General of these states participated in a conference call to discuss whether to join forces in an effort to investigate the various incidents and potentially bring actions in each of their respective states against Google. About thirty states joined the conference call last week. A number of other states are also concerned, and both states that participated in the call and those that did not are discussing whether to pool their resources for an investigation.
On Tuesday, Richard Brodsky, a New York State assemblyman who is running for Attorney General, asked that state to conduct an investigation into whether Google violated criminal laws. In a letter to Andrew Cuomo, the New York State Attorney General, Mr. Brodsky asked for a formal investigation into whether Google violated a number of state criminal laws.
“Violating legitimate expectations of privacy on the part of both homeowners and business people is an extraordinarily serious issue, and we want all the facts as quickly as possible,” Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut’s Attorney General, said in a phone interview. Mr. Blumenthal said the conference call with his counterparts “was the first step in an effort to cooperate in a possible joint investigation and action. At this point, we are asking questions and frankly some of the answers we received so far have raised additional questions that we have put to the company.” Based on his comments, further investigation seems likely.
Last month Google revealed the collection of the private data at issue, such as e-mails and other communications from unsecured wireless networks. Since then, the company has faced international civil and criminal investigations from Australia and various European countries. In the United States, prior to the Attorneys’ General conference call, the matter has been the subject of Congressional inquiries and class action lawsuits in several states.
Google declined to comment on the individual investigations or lawsuits. However, the company reiterated earlier statements that its collection of data from Wi-Fi networks was a mistake, and not an illegal one. Christine Chen, a spokesperson for Google commented that, “this was a mistake, but we don’t we believe we did anything illegal.” In the spirit of cooperation, she added, “we’re working with the relevant authorities to answer their questions and concerns.”
– Nicole Soussan
Tagged with: advertising • Andrew Cuomo • Attorney General • career • contracts • courts • creative content • criminal law • entertainment • financial • Google • government • information • intellectual property • internet • investigation • JETLaw • lawsuits • legislation • media • medicine • privacy • progress • Richard Blumenthal • Richard Brodsky • states • Street View • technology • telecommunications • U.S. Constitution • Wi-Fi
Recent Blog Posts
- Former Cardinals Executive Pleads Guilty to Hacking, But Will the Cardinals Pay the Price?
- Making a Murder – Technology in Forensic Evidence Questioned
- Is “smart gun” technology the future of gun safety?
- Why High-Profile Athletes’ Defamation Lawsuits Against Al Jazeera Are Nothing More Than a Hail Mary
- Executives of a Chinese Online Video-Sharing Service Provider Stood Trial for Internet Pornography
- The Rise of ‘Swatting’
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution