- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Recently, Nicole Polizzi, better known as “Snooki” from the hit MTV reality show, Jersey Shore, endured some hairballs when she was arrested for disorderly conduct and ridiculed for her anti-Obama statement about the tanning tax.
The newest drama involves a cartoon cat named “Snooky” from the children’s book Adventures of Snooky; Under the Sea by Karen Monaghan and Maureen Monaghan-Fabe. Quite the cat’s meow, the book won an American Graphic Design Award in 2004. “The situation” started when Snooki tried to trademark her name for use on books. Under the Lanham Act, a trademark should not be registered if it “so resembles a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office . . . as to be likely when used or in connection with goods or the application, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” According to a document on The Smoking Gun, the United States Patent and Trademark Office dug their claws in and refused to register the mark because of a likelihood of confusion between “Snooky” in “Adventures of Snooky” and “Snooki” when used on books.
However, Snooki does not have to take her poof down yet. A decision to refuse registration by an examiner can be appealed with the Trademark Trial Appeal Board. Until then, there is always season three.
– Jenn Weizenecker
Tagged with: Adventures of Snooky: Under the Sea • advertising • celebrities • contracts • courts • creative content • entertainment • government • intellectual property • Jersey Shore • Karen Monaghan • Lanham Act • lawsuits • Maureen Monaghan-Fabe • media • Nicole Polizzi • progress • Snooki • Snooky • tanning • technology • telecommunications • The Smoking Gun • Trademark Trial Appeal Board • trademarks
Recent Blog Posts
- Controlling the Uncontrollable: UK Taking the Driver’s Seat in Driverless Car Technology
- Obama’s Cybersecurity Executive Order: Private Sector Must Help Police the “Wild West”
- Qualcomm Settlement May Reconfigure the Smartphone Market in China
- Who Rightfully Owns the Village People’s YMCA?
- Internet Elections Regulation: Another Pie in the Partisan Food Fight?
- Great Artists Steal? A Music Theory Thought Experiment & a Worry about the Litigation of Popular Music
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution