- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
In the news. . .
After decades of litigation, legal battle over Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window ignites with new fervor.
Fox faces copyright infringement lawsuit over new reality show, My Parents Are Gonna Love You.
‘Real Housewife’, Danielle Staub, gets tricked then treated to litigation by ex-boyfriend who served her with defamation lawsuit at Halloween party.
After shutdown of peer-to-peer service, LimeWire still faces RIAA in trial to assess damages.
Father of the late Michael Jackson loses legal battle in control for pop star’s estate.
Hope springs eternal as studies show Netflix poses serious challenge to BitTorrent activity online.
Lawsuit against Girls Gone Wild turns into free speech debate about identities of women in videos.
Federal Judge orders Internet service provider to provide names of nearly 3,000 individuals who pirated copies of film Cornered!
All-powerful Oprah Winfrey sued for plagiarism by author of political booklet, How American Elects Her Presidents.
Trademark war erupts over Oscar contender, The Illusionist.
Tagged with: Alfred Hitchcock • bittorrent • books • career • celebrities • contracts • copyright • copyright infringement • Cornered! • courts • creative content • damages • Danielle Staub • defamation • entertainment • film/television • financial • Fox • Girls Gone Wild • government • How America Elects Her Presidents • intellectual property • internet • lawsuits • legislation • Limewire • litigation technology/legal process technology • media • Monday Morning JETLawg • music • My Parents Are Gonna Love You • Netflix • Oprah Winfrey • peer to peer • piracy • plagiarism • privacy • progress • radio • reality • Rear Window • RIAA • social networking • technology • The Illusionist • trademarks • U.S. Constitution
Recent Blog Posts
- Former Cardinals Executive Pleads Guilty to Hacking, But Will the Cardinals Pay the Price?
- Making a Murder – Technology in Forensic Evidence Questioned
- Is “smart gun” technology the future of gun safety?
- Why High-Profile Athletes’ Defamation Lawsuits Against Al Jazeera Are Nothing More Than a Hail Mary
- Executives of a Chinese Online Video-Sharing Service Provider Stood Trial for Internet Pornography
- The Rise of ‘Swatting’
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution