- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
In the news. . .
Estate of superstar Bette Davis sues Los Angeles clothing store for dress it claims violates the actress’s publicity rights.
Copyright issues still unresolved in the Barack Obama “HOPE” Image controversy.
RapidShare, named as a contributor to digital piracy by a MarkMonitor report, has threatened to sue for defamation.
Golden Globe Awards come under fire as former publicist sues Hollywood Foreign Press Association for “payola” connected to the show.
Smartphones may be turning regular citizens into digital pirates when camera phones used to capture copyrighted images.
Scholars grapple with the legal status of online personal information, looking to protection of letters and phone calls for guidance.
Second Circuit rules documentary filmmaker cannot invoke Journalist privilege to prevent Chevron from obtaining outtakes from the footage for litigation.
Hollywood watches as federal judge decides the constitutionality of strong protection of publicity rights for deceased celebrities.
Innovators struggle to get consumers to plan for what happens to their “digital life” after they die.
Sports agent raises eyebrows as he represents both sides of dispute among big executives for the Cleveland Browns.
Tagged with: agent • Barack Obama • Bette Davis • camera phone • career • celebrities • Cleveland Browns • contracts • copyright • courts • creative content • defamation • documentary • entertainment • film/television • financial • Golden Globe Awards • government • Hollywood Foreign Press Association • HOPE • intellectual property • internet • journalism • Journalist privilege • lawsuits • legislation • MarkMonitor • media • Monday Morning JETLawg • music • payola • personal information • piracy • privacy • progress • publicity rights • rapidshare • smartphone • social networking • sports • technology • U.S. Constitution
Recent Blog Posts
- Former Cardinals Executive Pleads Guilty to Hacking, But Will the Cardinals Pay the Price?
- Making a Murder – Technology in Forensic Evidence Questioned
- Is “smart gun” technology the future of gun safety?
- Why High-Profile Athletes’ Defamation Lawsuits Against Al Jazeera Are Nothing More Than a Hail Mary
- Executives of a Chinese Online Video-Sharing Service Provider Stood Trial for Internet Pornography
- The Rise of ‘Swatting’
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution