- Journal Archives
- Volume 19
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
- 2016-2017 Symposium
- 2015-2016 Symposium
- 2014-2015 Symposium
- 2013-2014 Symposium
- 2012-2013 Symposium
- 2011-2012 Symposium
- 2010-2011 Symposium
- 2009-2010 Symposium
- 2008-2009 Symposium
- 2007-2008 Symposium
In the news. . .
The King’s Speech involved with American Humane Society over impermissible use of their trademarked phrase “No animals were harmed” during the film’s credits.
The Future of Music Coalition kicks off new study to determine all the ways musicians can generate revenue in today’s music landscape.
Court rules that free Internet pornography does not unfairly compete with adult entertainment industry.
Super Bowl Sunday takes a new intellectual property twist as NFL claims it has the right to trademark the phrase “Super Bowl.”
British government takes a second look at plans to block websites that infringe copyrights.
Twitter stands firm in policy and First Amendment, stating Tweets will not be removed from the server on the basis of content.
Cease-and-Desist letters abound in defense of intellectual property rights, but is their publication ethical?
Apple files patent application for new stylus method to reach university students.
Government statutory license still keeps Pandora from playing exactly what you want.
Tagged with: adult entertainment • American Humane Society • Apple • Britain • cease-and-desist • celebrities • content restriction • contracts • copyright • copyright infringement • courts • creative content • entertainment • ethics • film/television • financial • First Amendment • Future of Music Coalition • government • intellectual property • internet • JETLaw • lawsuits • legislation • media • Monday Morning JETLawg • music • musician • NFL • no animals were harmed • Pandora • patents • pornography • progress • revenue • social networking • sports • statutory license • super bowl • technology • The King's Speech • trademarks • Twitter • U.S. Constitution
Recent Blog Posts
- Police Body Cameras: Just Another Tool for Mass Surveillance?
- NY AG Warns Developers of Popular Health Apps Who Can’t Support Their Marketing Claims: “My Office Will Not Hesitate to Take Action.”
- Take After Will Smith by Keeping Your Driving Skills Polished (At Least for Now)
- Will Patent Litigation Still be Big in Texas? The Supreme Court Hears Arguments for TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands
- Lyft, Drivers Settle; Punt Million Dollar Employee vs. Independent Contractor Classification Question Into the Future.
- Cybersecurity for Autonomous Vehicles
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution