- Journal Archives
- Volume 20
- Volume 19
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
- 2017-2018 Symposium
- 2016-2017 Symposium
- 2015-2016 Symposium
- 2014-2015 Symposium
- 2013-2014 Symposium
- 2012-2013 Symposium
- 2011-2012 Symposium
- 2010-2011 Symposium
- 2009-2010 Symposium
- 2008-2009 Symposium
- 2007-2008 Symposium
In the news. . .
Major Hollywood studios get victory over “Family-Friendly” DVD service that strips films of objectionable content.
Judge orders shutdown of TV streaming site, despite periodic statutory licensing payments.
France becomes destination of choice for celebrities looking to forum shop for plaintiff-friendly defamation laws.
Law firm that claimed victory on behalf of funk master George Clinton in Bridgeport litigation sues to claim nearly $2 million in unpaid legal fees.
Radiohead manages to beat online pirates by advertising album release date then releasing record a week early.
Hulk Hogan sues car dealership for stealing his catchphrases.
Family of man who created Betty Boop loses battle to be declared exclusive copyright and trademark owner over the character.
Changes to Google’s search engine results prompts websites to complain that changes hurt business.
Verizon may face litigation similar to Apple over flaw in new iPhone.
Tagged with: advertising • album • Apple • Betty Boop • Bridgeport litigation • career • catchphrase • content • contracts • copyright • courts • creative content • defamation • family-friendly • forum shopping • France • George Clinton • Google • Hollywood • Hulk Hogan • iPhone • legal fees • piracy • Radiohead • search engine • statutory license • streaming • trademarks • U.S. Constitution • Verizon • websites
Recent Blog Posts
- Guest Post: Virtual Reality as an Agent of Legal Change
- May It Please the Court…and Facebook?
- Unionization Within The Video Game Industry Is A Looming Threat
- Aerial Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment
- Cambridge Analytica & One Professor’s Lesson in Britain’s Data Protection Act
- “Fake News”, Twitter Bots, and the First Amendment
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution