- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
As we mentioned in this Monday Morning JETLawg, last week at an education summit, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg suggested that children under the age of thirteen should be allowed on social networking sites like Facebook. Zuckerberg explained that Facebook would take precautions to protect children, and their access to social media could actually be a positive and educational influence.
As it currently stands, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) prevents online sites that take personal information from allowing children under thirteen to sign on. Facebook’s terms technically comply with the Act. Still, one study has found that 7.5 million Facebook users are actually twelve or under. In fact, this study suggests that 5 million are actually ten or under.
Zuckerberg, only 27 himself, corrected his initial suggestion at an e-G8 forum today. He assured that no plans were in the works to try to get around COPPA. Still, he acknowledged that enforcing the age requirement (and otherwise protecting children) is not a top priority: ”That’s just not top of the list of things for us to figure out right now,” he announced.
Even if Facebook remains (at least technically) off-limits to children under thirteen, these kids’ presence on the site poses a number of other legal concerns. Personal and family privacy issues, 1st Amendment rights, and a multitude of cyber-crimes (like identity theft, child pornography, and harrassment) all seem more complicated and sensitive when younger children are involved. On the other hand, one research project indicates that, although the media has emphasized the danger of social networking sites to children, “youth are not at particular risk” when interacting on social networking sites like Facebook.
Regardless of Zuckerberg’s current stance, as more and more children join Facebook at younger and younger ages, both Facebook and the legal system will have to consider whether it should better enforce the current restrictions. If, on the other hand, Facebook in fact begins “friending” these kids, it will likely face pressure to at least build in better protections.
Tagged with: social networking
Recent Blog Posts
- First Circuit Aligns With Third: Actavis Extends Beyond Cash Settlements
- Current Issues in Technology Law: Dr. Asma Vranaki Analyzes Data Privacy Regulation in the Context of Facebook Advertisements
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Rises in National Law Journal Rankings
- Dancing Babies: The Ninth Circuit May Have Protected Them from Computer Algorithms
- Starbucks’ Next Top Model: It Could Be You
- The Official Legal Showdown: Protecting Street Art, Wynwood Art District as a Case Study, Part 2
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution