- Journal Archives
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Last Thursday, Google introduced Google Wallet, a new application allowing users to make transactions by waving their cellphones, rather than sliding credit cards. Keyed for phones with the Android operating system, Google Wallet will allow users to pay for items, redeem coupons, and earn loyalty points all in one wave. However, the application has limited availability currently. Only consumers with the Samsung Nexus S 4G phone, sold by the nation’s third-largest wireless carrier, Sprint, will be able to use the application this summer. The Nexus S 4G comes with Android’s latest software, Android 2.3 “Gingerbread,” which supports the native field communications (NFC) wireless technology necessary to run the application and keep users’ credit card safe. Assuming one uses a Nexus S 4G, a consumer must use either a Citi Mastercard or a Google prepaid Mastercard to wave to pay. Moreover, while several companies, such as Subway, Bloomingdale’s, and American Eagle, have become early partners in Google’s virtual wallet project, all of the retailers will need to upgrade their payment terminals. With such limited availability of Google Wallet, will retailers have the incentive to undergo this upgrade?
It seems so. On the same day as Google’s announcement, PayPal filed suit in a California court, claiming Google stole PayPal’s trade secrets in order to create Google Wallet. PayPal pleads that it had been developing the technology to provide large retailers with mobile payment capabilities. PayPal’s complaint states that a PayPal employee with “intimate knowledge” of this development was hired at Google shortly after failed negotiations between the two companies concerning the possibility of PayPal becoming Google’s payment platform. Google responded that it respects trade secrets and intends to defend itself against the lawsuit, and that “Silicon Valley was built on the ability of individuals to use their knowledge and expertise to seek better employment opportunities, an idea recognized by both California law and public policy.”
With wireless carriers, technology companies, banks, credit card issuers, and payment networks all affected by the Google Wallet technology, PayPal’s immediate fuss about what promises to be a slow-developing revolution is not much ado about nothing.
- Whitney Boshers
Recent Blog Posts
- Neiman Marcus Shoppers Suffer Financial Injuries! Possibly
- Facebook Gears up for Trademark Fight With Brazilian Competitor
- Draft Kings: A fantasy sports betting website valued close to $1 Billion
- Are Design Patents Really a Wise Investment Now?
- The Door Left Ajar: Navigating the Patent-Antitrust Paradox in Light of King Drug Co. v. GlaxoSmithKline
- Will Feds Preempt Tougher State Data Breach Laws?
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution