- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Here’s to lifting your ledes:
But that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea, because
So add this blog post to the list of daily updates to jeopardize this journal.
Reposting segments from articles is a mainstay in the blogosphere. Republishing entire articles, however, may amount to copyright infringement. Monday’s action was just one of more than 250 lawsuits making such allegations from newspaper custodian Righthaven LLC.
Righthaven, a copyright holding company, partners with newspapers to litigate infringement. This Monday, in Righthaven, LLC v. Hoehn (pdf), the District of Nevada granted a motion for summary judgment on behalf of the defendant, a registered user on madjacksports.com. Hoehn, a Vietnam veteran, had reposted an entire article from the Las Vegas Review Journal on the site’s message board. He argued that his actions amounted to fair use.
Fair use is an affirmative defense to copyright infringement codified in the Copyright Act of 1976. The defense is reserved for “purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . . scholarship, or research.” To determine whether it applies, courts consider (1) the purpose of the use; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount of the copyrighted work used; and (4) the effect on the copyrighted work’s market value.
In Monday’s order, the court found that only the third factor favored Righthaven. The Court reasoned that Hoehn reposted for a noncommercial purpose. The article was a noncreative work, and Righthaven failed to show the posting had any harm on the article’s value.
But forget fair use. Monday’s ruling may be the least of Righthaven’s worries. On Wednesday, a court ruled Righthaven lacked standing to seek damages on copyrights it doesn’t own.
Recent Blog Posts
- Former Cardinals Executive Pleads Guilty to Hacking, But Will the Cardinals Pay the Price?
- Making a Murder – Technology in Forensic Evidence Questioned
- Is “smart gun” technology the future of gun safety?
- Why High-Profile Athletes’ Defamation Lawsuits Against Al Jazeera Are Nothing More Than a Hail Mary
- Executives of a Chinese Online Video-Sharing Service Provider Stood Trial for Internet Pornography
- The Rise of ‘Swatting’
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution