- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
The National Center on Addiction and and Substance Abuse (CASA) has just released their “National Survey of American Attitudes on Substance Abuse XVI,” which claims that social networking websites such as Twitter and Facebook can cause teens between the ages of 12 – 17 to be more likely to drink alcohol and abuse both illegal and prescription drugs. CASA is headed by former US Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, Joseph A. Califano, who accused social networking sites that allow images of teens drinking and using drugs of committing “electronic child abuse.” According to the report, teens who have used social networking websites to view photographs of friends engaging in certain behaviors are three times likelier to use alcohol, four times likelier to use marijuana, and “much” likelier to have friends and classmates who abuse illegal and prescription drugs.
In addition to the questionable calculations, CASA’s report seems to mistake correlation with causation. It is unlikely that the mere sight of friends and acquaintances engaging in a certain type of behavior will lead teenagers to engage in activity they would otherwise be opposed to. Rather, teens most likely view their friends on social networking sites engaging in the type of activity they themselves have, or currently are, engaging in.
Actually, teen drug and alcohol use is lower today than it was in the days before the Internet and social networking sites took off. Time Magazine reports that in 1995 the percentage of teens that reported smoking marijuana and drinking alcohol were both higher than recent reports, and the numbers from the 1980′s and 1970′s are even higher.
Perhaps most shocking about the report is CASA’s own apparent disbelief of its hysteria-inducing analysis of Facebook and Twitter use: its own website is sprinkled with pictures of spilled alcohol bottles, a girl reaching for a joint, and what looks like a ten or eleven year old boy lighting up a cigarette. All of which begs the question: if CASA can’t even take itself seriously, why should we?
– Susan Reilly
Tagged with: social networking
Recent Blog Posts
- If You Build It, They Will Come: Baseball and the Reopening of Cuba
- First Circuit Aligns With Third: Actavis Extends Beyond Cash Settlements
- Current Issues in Technology Law: Dr. Asma Vranaki Analyzes Data Privacy Regulation in the Context of Facebook Advertisements
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Rises in National Law Journal Rankings
- Dancing Babies: The Ninth Circuit May Have Protected Them from Computer Algorithms
- Starbucks’ Next Top Model: It Could Be You
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution