- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Americans have become increasingly accustomed to the use of drones, unmanned aircraft, in military operations abroad. However, if drones were flying through neighborhoods here in the US, it may raise new issues. New regulations expected from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) may soon permit just that. The FAA has historically limited civilian use of unmanned aircraft to recreational purposes. However, in early February, Congress passed the FAA Reauthorization Act ordering the FAA to develop regulations on the testing and licensing of commercial drones by 2015. These regulations, once issued, could open the door for private entities to use drones for a broader range of purposes.
Private interest in the use of drones has increased in recent years, as have government efforts to regulate it. The LA Police Department has recently warned local real estate agents against using images of properties captured by drone-mounted cameras due to concerns about whether this use complies with federal regulations. A drone hobbyist in Texas, who was using his unmanned aircraft for recreational purposes, recently crossed the line into using it for surveillance purposes when he spotted a river running red with blood, thereby triggering a criminal investigation of a nearby meat-processing facility for environmental crimes. The FAA is primarily interested in maintaining the safety of our national airspace, and allowing private use of drones to continue without regulation could pose a hazard to other aircraft that may encounter a drone in their flight path.
The FAA’s regulations are expected to provide guidelines for testing and licensing drones. Acknowledging the increasing popularity of drones by regulating their use instead of prohibiting it will not only provide for a safer airspace, but will also provide many businesses with unique opportunities to make or save money. Civilian demand for drone use is wide ranging, including aerial photography, crop monitoring, advertising, communications, and broadcasting. The energy industry, however, has much to gain from the use of drones and has been leading the charge in sanctioning private use of drones for commercial purposes.
Monitoring pipeline and drilling rigs with drones can save energy companies money and improve safety and operations. These companies have hundreds of miles of pipeline to monitor for leaks and other hazards and currently employ helicopters to carry out aerial surveillance on a daily basis. Substituting drones for the $300/hour helicopters could result in significant cost savings. In addition, drones can be used to avoid dangerous situations that currently have costly solutions. For instance, drones can be used to inspect drilling rigs instead sending employees up on expensive and hazardous scaffolding. Drones can also be used to inspect facilities while they are in use, even if that situation may be dangerous for humans. For example, basic crude processing plants, whose pilot flames can jump from 3 to 300 feet in a matter of seconds, must be shut down before people can approach the facility to assess its maintenance needs. Drones can inspect the facility for maintenance issues while it is in operation, thus avoiding regular plant shut-downs and increasing timeliness of addressing maintenance concerns.
The FAA’s new regulations could provide opportunities to increase efficiency, save money, and enhance safety through the use of drones, but it will be interesting to see how Americans react to the use of what has traditionally be considered a military technology in their own back yard.
– A. McKeithen
Recent Blog Posts
- Obama’s Cybersecurity Executive Order: Private Sector Must Help Police the “Wild West”
- Qualcomm Settlement May Reconfigure the Smartphone Market in China
- Who Rightfully Owns the Village People’s YMCA?
- Internet Elections Regulation: Another Pie in the Partisan Food Fight?
- Great Artists Steal? A Music Theory Thought Experiment & a Worry about the Litigation of Popular Music
- What to Expect After Teva v. Sandoz?
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution