- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Are you a ski lawyer wondering how to best protect your clients from personal injury, death, or an embarrassing charge of failure to observe ski hazard warnings? Last time we helped ski resort owners use environmental law to their advantage against creditors; in this article, we advise those who want to protect themselves against mother nature herself.
Over the weekend, an avalanche in Washington swept away at least four backcountry skiers, killing three. Professional skier Elyse Saugstad credited her safety equipment with her survival. While the article accurately describes it as an “airbag from her backpack,” it deserves a closer look. It’s essentially a snow floatation device, allowing the wearer to stay near the surface of the avalanche to better reach oxygen. It’s a long way from the Q’s invention in The World Is Not Enough, which was patented decades ago – see patent number 4,943,252, describing how the user must pull the inflation tab and immediately assume a crouched position while the ball envelops her. In a real avalanche, it would take incredible coordination and strength to safely use such an avalanche ball (and might also require ski removal) – watch this harrowing, first person perspective to see how quickly one must react. Even with multiple friends watching, a lost glove to help locate him, and an oxygen system, the skier was unable to fully breathe under the snow, and unable to move to dig himself out or reach oxygen.
Fortunately, there are a number of devices to assist in an avalanche rescue system. Victims can arm themselves with oxygen systems, locator reflectors, and inflation devices, while rescuers can use locator beacons, probes, shovels, and dogs. The safest option by far is to ski in bounds, where avalanche risks are actively patrolled via Howitzer artillery or M60 tank. What does the future of avalanche control foretell? While artillery and tanks are excellent for current avalanche control needs, legal scholars recommend increased use of Apache helicopters as well.
– Andrew Ralls
Recent Blog Posts
- Controlling the Uncontrollable: UK Taking the Driver’s Seat in Driverless Car Technology
- Obama’s Cybersecurity Executive Order: Private Sector Must Help Police the “Wild West”
- Qualcomm Settlement May Reconfigure the Smartphone Market in China
- Who Rightfully Owns the Village People’s YMCA?
- Internet Elections Regulation: Another Pie in the Partisan Food Fight?
- Great Artists Steal? A Music Theory Thought Experiment & a Worry about the Litigation of Popular Music
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution