- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
In 2012, trying to envision an America without football seems impossible. Just the notion is downright laughable, especially for those of us living in Nashville, Tennessee: SEC country, where football is king and basketball is that funny sport people play when football season is over. But Economics professors Tyler Cowen and Kevin Grier think a combination of litigation and an emerging medical awareness of the long-term effects of concussions could very well lead to the “End of Football.”
The Centers for Disease Control estimate that between 1.6 and 3.8 million teenage athletes sustain brain injuries each year, with high school football causing 3 times as many concussions as the second most dangerous sport–girls’ soccer, if you’re interested. Jonah Lehrer has written of recent research into the long-term effects of concussions: “football players with multiple concussions were 7.7 times more likely to experience a ‘major drop in memory performance.’” Further, the students with concussions had significantly lower GPAs than athletes who had not sustained concussions. More alarmingly, both ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease) and CTE (another progressive degenerative disease) have been linked to concussions, with one CTE-suffering football player tragically committing suicide.
This new awareness of the consequences of concussions has led to litigation. Much litigation. Just this last Friday (Feb. 17, 2012), two concussion-related lawsuits were filed against the NFL, one by a group of 49 players and the other as a class action purporting to represent every NFL player or spouse of a player who had ever suffered a concussion. There are currently 31 concussion suits pending against the NFL.
Cowen and Grier’s theory goes something like this: as litigation continues, just one or two major payouts could signifantly raise insurance costs for the NFL, its franchises, college football teams, and high school teams. That cost may not be worth it for some schools, especially high schools. At the same time, the publicity from the sales may lead parents to start not allowing their sons to play football, especially at wealthier private schools. There might then be what Cowen and Grier term a “contagion” effect where parents follow each other’s lead in being good parents and not letting their sons participate in such a dangerous sport. Fewer players means fewer college teams and eventually fewer pro teams. The feeder system runs dry. The sport will no longer get the top talent, so even the remaining teams aren’t as fun to watch. And the domino effect goes on.
Outlandish? Crazy? Probably. But maybe not. After all, in 1912, the three top sports in America were baseball, horse racing, and boxing. Times change.
– Joel Slater
Recent Blog Posts
- Nickelodeon’s Kids v. Google
- Ivanpah Solar Plant’s Firey Clash of Environmental Objectives
- The Silk Road: An Insight Into the Future of Internet Regulation?
- JETLaw Symposium on Intellectual Property Tomorrow
- San Jose Strikes Out Again in Suit Against MLB
- National Marine Fisheries Service Enters the Electronic Age
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution