- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
ICANN, the international coordinator for the internet’s naming system, ended yesterday its registration process for companies to register a new gTLD. To bring everyone up to speed, a TLD, or “Top Level Domain” is the .com, .net, .org, etc., that internet addresses are based on. ICANN recently proposed to allow companies to register their own name (or anything else) as a custom Generic Top Level Domain (gTLD). Talor Bearman, in a post back in December 2011 wondered whether this was a good opportunity for companies to brand themselves even further, or whether it was just a moneymaking scheme on ICANN’s part. We have also posted questions about the effects this will have on defensive registrations of gTLDs. For example, what happens when an association of apple farmers wants to register .apple, and Apple, Inc. (everyone’s favorite producer of iGadgets) wants to register the same gTLD? Today we are seeing the initial effects of the gTLD registration program.
Although ICANN isn’t releasing the full list of applicants and their proposed new domains until June 13, Google has revealed some of the gTLDs that it has registered. Some of these are to be expected: .google, .docs, .youtube. But good ‘ole Google has also registered .lol. Yes, you’re reading that right. Google states that it is bidding for .lol and other TLDs because of their “interesting and creative potential.” (Only time will tell if Google really just wants the domain so it can own funnycats.lol)
We have only a couple more weeks until ICANN unveils the full list of registrations. Hopefully our initial concerns over consumer confusion, company branding, defensive registrations, and funny cat pictures will be answered. After all, who wants an internet where only Google controls the .lols?
– Brandon Trout
Recent Blog Posts
- Controlling the Uncontrollable: UK Taking the Driver’s Seat in Driverless Car Technology
- Obama’s Cybersecurity Executive Order: Private Sector Must Help Police the “Wild West”
- Qualcomm Settlement May Reconfigure the Smartphone Market in China
- Who Rightfully Owns the Village People’s YMCA?
- Internet Elections Regulation: Another Pie in the Partisan Food Fight?
- Great Artists Steal? A Music Theory Thought Experiment & a Worry about the Litigation of Popular Music
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution