- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Any college or graduate student knows that a new semester of classes means a new semester of paying sky-high prices for textbooks. Since costly books are not very conducive to an “in-school” budget, students instead often buy used books from upperclassmen or make photocopies if the professor places a textbook on reserve in the library.
However, an economics professor at the University of Puerto Rico – Rio Piedras, is trying to put a stop to these practices with a new patent aimed at combatting publishers’ revenue depletion from piracy. Joseph Henry Vogel recently obtained U.S. Patent No. 8195571 for a “web-based system” that ultimately links a student’s grade with their textbook purchase. Here is how it works: the publisher would license its book to a professor, and in order to receive the license, the professor would have to conduct an online discussion board as part of the class. A portion of the student’s grade would then involve participating in this online discussion board. To access the board, however, the student would need a code listed in a new textbook associated with the course. Used books would still be available from the bookstore, but students would also have to buy a discounted code to access the online discussion. A student’s failure to participate in the online board would be reflected in their grade.
Obviously the patent is not self-fulfilling – it would first require a professor to choose to implement this system. Vogel asserts that protecting textbook revenue will allow professors to continue publishing their research. However, many critics are questioning whether this method is truly affordable, or, even more unsettling, whether this means that a student is essentially paying for their grade. In his press release, Vogel attempted to address these concerns by first suggesting that the fee should be waived for students from “low and moderate-income families.” Second, Vogel classified his system as one of “bounded openness,” and argued that such a system would actually promote equity: if access to the discussion board becomes the true object of payment (as opposed to the textbook), then publishers will have an incentive to upload the accompanying textbook for free, under the fair use doctrine.
While Vogel has taken an ambitious stance with this patent, many questions remain. Would professors ever choose to implement this? If, as Vogel asserts, access to the discussion board becomes the actual product, will the price of the code change to reflect the former price of the associated textbook? Vogel’s patent may work in theory, but in application there appears to be many hurdles that need to be overcome before such a system could be instituted.
– Katharine Skinner
Recent Blog Posts
- If You Build It, They Will Come: Baseball and the Reopening of Cuba
- First Circuit Aligns With Third: Actavis Extends Beyond Cash Settlements
- Current Issues in Technology Law: Dr. Asma Vranaki Analyzes Data Privacy Regulation in the Context of Facebook Advertisements
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Rises in National Law Journal Rankings
- Dancing Babies: The Ninth Circuit May Have Protected Them from Computer Algorithms
- Starbucks’ Next Top Model: It Could Be You
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution