- Journal Archives
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
One of the traditional justifications for copyright law is that it incentivizes inventors to create. Recently one MIT economist, Abhishek Nagaraj, studied how the copyright law regime affects Wikipedia and how resources like Wikipedia affect our collective body of knowledge. The issues go back to Google starting to digitize magazines in 2008. (You may be familiar with the pending Google Book litigation.) One of the magazines Google digitized was Baseball Digest, which was the oldest and longest-running (1945-2008) baseball related journals and included images of the players. Wikipedia writers found the wealth of information supplied by Google and used it to improve Wikipedia’s baseball articles. The study found that the articles focused on baseball players in the years between 1944 and 1984 increased by approximately 5200 words.
Under copyright law, the images in the magazines from before 1964 were in the public domain, so Wikipedia could only use those images on the website. Nagaraj used the break to form two groups for his study: a control group of the baseball players from 1964-84 and a test group of the baseball players from 1944-1964. Nagaraj compared the two groups to see the difference in length, number of images, and traffic. The length of the articles was not affected by the change in copyright law. However, copyright law directly affected the amount of photos on the page. Articles with pictures available in the public domain had more than twice as many photos on average as articles requiring protected photos.
According to the study, more pictures led to more traffic on the pages. The most popular articles from before 1964 increased hits by 70%, and the least popular articles saw hits increase by 25%. Furthermore, those articles were edited more frequently because Google rewards updated content and more images. The study controlled for many factors like longevity of players’ careers or being left handed. What the study found was that while copyrights do not affect the amount of information in the public domain (length of articles), copyrights affect how the public uses information once it is there because of the way search rewards articles with digital public domain photos. The results of Nagaraj’s study are the beginning of how we study the way copyright law affects one communities knowledge and access to information. Do you think this is a problem? If so, do you think it should be remedied through legal means or through new searching algorithms, or do you have another suggestion?
–Samara C. Pals Cramer
Recent Blog Posts
- Hiding Behind the Computer Screen: James Woods Files Defamation Lawsuit Against a Twitter User
- Let’s Enjoy Fantasy Football…While We Can
- Guest Post: Tweeting Away Patient Privacy
- Naturally Occurring or Mind-made?
- Does China’s 2022 Winter Olympics Song Intentionally Plagiarized ‘Frozen’s’ ‘Let It Go’?
- Neurosurgical Advances Raise Novel Legal and Ethical Implications
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution