- Journal Archives
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
“Patent trolls” (now often called by nicer names like “non-practicing entities” or “patent assertion entities”), which seek to make money by buying up patents and asserting that companies have infringed them, have been giving members of IP-heavy industries headaches for a while now. Patent protection is intended to benefit the economy and society by spurring innovation, but the problem of trolling is becoming so common that it is arguably slowing innovation by many companies and creating harmful economic inefficiencies. Proposals for solutions to the trolling problem have begun to emerge. JETLaw member Niels Melius, in his note “Trolling for Standards: How Courts and the Administrative State Can Help Deter Patent Hold Up and Promote Innovation,” argues that Congress should give the FTC substantive rule-making authority to address how a certain troll practice (known as “patent hold up”) should be handled in district courts to achieve more efficient outcomes. (See JETLaw’s upcoming Volume 15.)
Two Congressmen have also recently proposed a bill that they believe will deter trolling. The bill, know as the SHIELD (“Saving High-tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes”) Act, would require trolls to pay opposing parties’ legal fees if a court determined that the troll’s suit had no reasonable likelihood of succeeding. The text of the bill, which is co-sponsored by Reps. Peter DeFazio (D., Ore.) and Jason Chaffetz (R., Utah), is available here. Although the bill would only apply to software and computer hardware patents, trolling does seem to be a particularly troubling issue in the tech industry: a Boston University study concluded that troll lawsuits costs U.S. tech companies more than $29 billion in 2011.
The SHIELD Act has received the backing of the Consumer Electronics Association, and Mr. DeFazio stated that he was unaware of any major objections to the bill. What do you think about the possibility of its passing, particularly with the upcoming presidential election (which DeFazio noted might pose a problem because many legislators are hesitant to pass significant legislation on the eve of a presidential election)? Do you think it will be effective in deterring trolling?
Recent Blog Posts
- The Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Jumps Thirty-One Spots to Highest Ranking Ever
- Hiding Behind the Computer Screen: James Woods Files Defamation Lawsuit Against a Twitter User
- Let’s Enjoy Fantasy Football…While We Can
- Guest Post: Tweeting Away Patient Privacy
- Naturally Occurring or Mind-made?
- Does China’s 2022 Winter Olympics Song Intentionally Plagiarized ‘Frozen’s’ ‘Let It Go’?
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution