- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Search engine optimization? It can literally mean the difference between your site being one of the most popular search destinations with millions of hits a day to being seen by only the very few most profligate searchers. In today’s online world, almost all users utilize a search engine, the most prominent of which is clearly Google, in order to find website or service they seek.
So when Google announced this week that it is updating its search algorithm to downgrade websites that have frequent occurences of piracy on their sites, some stopped to take note. For the sites that receive more take down notices, Google will award a lower relevancy and result ranking, meaning that illegitimate sites will be pushed lower and legitimate sites are pushed higher in the results. This translates directly into fewer and more hits given the same search, respectively. Now remember, Google is not actually evaluating the sites themselves, only the number of take down notices that a particular site receives.
Many critics, however, met the announcement with only a mediocre response as many of Google’s staunchest opponents–those that have since Google’s inception consistently levied critique on Google as a major facilitator of copyright and trademark violation–claimed this is far too little to help purge Google’s infringement sins. In some ways, their critique is warranted as the downgrading does nothing to shut down sites but only to help promote legitimate content. In other ways, however, it will hit these illegitimate sites right where it hurts: the bottom line – a place that has been hurting for many of the media companies most affected by the announcement with whom Google would like to curry favor on the eve of the launch of Google Play.
So what’s the big deal? Does any of this matter? Certainly, it is an interesting phenomenon that Google is venturing ever more into an analysis of the validity and legitimacy of the content of sites included in its search results. Whether or not there will be any effect on the fight on piracy or whether this move by Google will simply facilitate the spread of illegal material to new sites remain to be seen.
Still, the bigger question is what is the proper role of search engines in monitoring, promoting, or otherwise evaluating the merits of the sites that are evaluated by their algorithms? Should Google take such a forefront approach, or should it simply promote well-crafted relevancy, regardless the moral or legal nature of the user’s search? Also, should it use correlations like take down notices into account?
Perhaps it is time for one of the biggest companies to flex some of its muscle to promote legitimate content. Or maybe it is precisely because of its size Google should leave the moral and political debate outside of search relevancy. What’s the right answer? Try googling it.
– Tim Van Hal
Recent Blog Posts
- Centralizing Cybersecurity in the Digital Age
- Justice Department Deals a Blow to Songwriters
- If You Build It, They Will Come: Baseball and the Reopening of Cuba
- First Circuit Aligns With Third: Actavis Extends Beyond Cash Settlements
- Current Issues in Technology Law: Dr. Asma Vranaki Analyzes Data Privacy Regulation in the Context of Facebook Advertisements
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Rises in National Law Journal Rankings
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution