- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
The Drug Enforcement Administration recently dropped charges against a fugitive doctor charged in the nation’s largest prosecution of internet pharmacies because there was simply too much evidence. That’s right, too much evidence, not too little.
In 2007, Armando Angulo was indicted for a multimillion dollar scheme in which he sold prescription drugs to patients who were neither examined nor interviewed by a doctor. Angulo first came under investigation in 2004, at which time he fled from Miami, Florida back to his native Panama. Fortunately for Angulo, Panama refuses to extradite its own citizens.
With Angulo out of the country, the DEA was left in the awkward position of maintaining the massive amount of evidence linked to the open case against the doctor. For years the DEA was storing over two terabytes of data in connection with the charges against Angulo. Two terabytes is a massive amount of data. Many millions of pages of data can be stored in two terabytes. This large amount of evidence against Angulo, however, became problematic.
The DEA only has approximately 40 terabytes of storage total. Because it appeared unlikely that Angulo was ever going to return the US, prosecutors moved to dismiss the charges against the fugitive for the sole purpose of freeing up the two terabytes of data space!
Even though two terabytes is a massive amount of data, it isn’t hard to acquire or overly expensive. A two terabyte drive can be bought on Amazon.com for $120. It seems strange that the DEA would be so limited in its digital storage space. Why can’t the DEA simply purchase more storage? Is it difficult to provide the necessary security? Surely, there is a good answer.
For Angulo, the answer is simply some good fortune. U.S. District Court Judge Linda Reade granted the motion and dismissed the case with prejudice, barring it from being refiled in the future. Fortunately, there are other charges still pending against Angulo; nevertheless, this seems like an unacceptable reason for the DEA to have dropped a slam dunk case.
Tagged with: government
Recent Blog Posts
- First Circuit Aligns With Third: Actavis Extends Beyond Cash Settlements
- Current Issues in Technology Law: Dr. Asma Vranaki Analyzes Data Privacy Regulation in the Context of Facebook Advertisements
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Rises in National Law Journal Rankings
- Dancing Babies: The Ninth Circuit May Have Protected Them from Computer Algorithms
- Starbucks’ Next Top Model: It Could Be You
- The Official Legal Showdown: Protecting Street Art, Wynwood Art District as a Case Study, Part 2
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution