- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
On August 21st, President Obama’s campaign manager Jim Messina sent the first-ever text message donation to a presidential campaign–a whopping $10. While the Obama campaign is no stranger to six-figure contributions, it hopes this development will encourage small donors to give “whatever they can afford.” This innovative use of technology is designed to reignite the grassroots spirit that propelled President Obama to the White House in the first place. It is meant to show that sometimes the actual contribution amount is moot–what matters is giving people a stake in the game.
Still, though the Obama campaign was the first to go live with its system, it does not deserve sole credit for pioneering the idea. In fact, the American Red Cross and other charities have long used text message donations as an effective fundraising tool–donations tend to be impulsive, and a text message simplifies the process.
Moreover, the plan to use text message contributions in the presidential campaign has widespread bipartisan support. Both Republican and Democratic political consulting firms submitted proposals to the Federal Election Commission, and the Romney campaign plans to a launch a similar system to Obama’s.
It remains to be seen whether this change will have any substantial effect on compaign giving, and whether it was wise to involve third-party wireless carriers in the world of campaign contributions. For example, it is unclear how much they will charge for collecting the donations by text. Furthermore, wireless providers have already asked the FEC for the flexibility to reject working some campaigns they deemed too controversial.
Nevertheless, despite some uncertainty as to how this will play out, this is still a brilliant nod to the small donor. To some, like yours truly, $10 is an actual fortune, a world of possibilities. Long ago, when I was actually paid to do things, my work day was divided into $10 increments–with every hour that ticked by, I was $10 richer. $10 is something of value to me, as it is to most Americans, so when I donate even that small amount, it means something. It means that I am committed, that I have a stake in the outcome, that I will show up for my team on Election Day–and that is what the candidates ultimately need.
Now, if only you could vote via text message.
Recent Blog Posts
- Former Cardinals Executive Pleads Guilty to Hacking, But Will the Cardinals Pay the Price?
- Making a Murder – Technology in Forensic Evidence Questioned
- Is “smart gun” technology the future of gun safety?
- Why High-Profile Athletes’ Defamation Lawsuits Against Al Jazeera Are Nothing More Than a Hail Mary
- Executives of a Chinese Online Video-Sharing Service Provider Stood Trial for Internet Pornography
- The Rise of ‘Swatting’
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution