- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
In an effort to find extra revenue and cut down on tax dodging, several states across the nation have passed laws targeting the use of tax zappers, software that allows business owners to evade taxes by underreporting taxable revenues.
Tax zapping software is often used by businesses that deal primarily in cash. When installed on an electronic cash register, the software allows business owners to manipulate the amount of revenue recorded, essentially keeping two sets of books.
While creators of tax zapping software claim that the device leaves no electronic footprint, state and federal agencies can easily detect signs of zapper use through an electronic audit of a specific machine. When an audit is conducted, cash registers, hard drives, and other devices are typically confiscated an analyzed an sophisticated labs.
States are fighting back after losing a significant amount of revenue to tax zapping schemes. According one estimate, as many as 30% of cash-based businesses use tax zappers to avoid taxes. Heavy use of tax zappers in the restaurant industry, for example, cost California almost $3 billion in tax revenue in a single year, while New York estimates losses of almost $2 billion.
In a time of budget shortfalls, states facing billions in lost revenue are taking notice. So far Michigan, Florida, Georgia, Maine, Utah and West Virginia have passed laws targeting tax zappers. While cheating on taxes has never been legal, the new laws make it a felony for one to sell, possess, or use tax zapping software. In Michigan, for example, violating the new law comes with a one-year minimum jail sentence and harsh financial penalties.
Experts expect to see many more of these laws passed within the coming year. Five additional states have drafted bills targeting tax zappers, while at least three others are considering legislation. Soon, unethical entrepreneurs may be looking for a less risky way to put a few extra tax dollars into their own pockets.
Recent Blog Posts
- Controlling the Uncontrollable: UK Taking the Driver’s Seat in Driverless Car Technology
- Obama’s Cybersecurity Executive Order: Private Sector Must Help Police the “Wild West”
- Qualcomm Settlement May Reconfigure the Smartphone Market in China
- Who Rightfully Owns the Village People’s YMCA?
- Internet Elections Regulation: Another Pie in the Partisan Food Fight?
- Great Artists Steal? A Music Theory Thought Experiment & a Worry about the Litigation of Popular Music
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution