- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Tim Tebow, the New York Jets back-up quarterback, has moved one step closer to trademarking his signature move of “Tebowing.” On October 9, the trademark was published for opposition, meaning that anyone who wants to oppose the registration has 30 days to file a substantiated claim. If no one does, then Tim Tebow will officially own “Tebowing.”
The phrase and act of “Tebowing” became popular earlier this year when Tebow, after leading the Denver Broncos to a series of comeback wins, was photographed bowing in prayer in the end zone on one knee, helmet to clenched fist.
Quickly after Kleinstein’s application was rejected, an organization owned by Tim Tebow (XV Enterprises LLC) filed an application to claim the trademark. However, Tebow claims that he does not want to use the trademark for commercial purposes but wants “to just control how it’s used, make sure it’s used the right way.” Yet, if he does not use the trademark for commercial purposes, then he may lose his rights to it.
Furthermore, if Tim Tebow does enforce his trademark rights, this act could set an interesting precedent in terms of religious expression. While the government cannot tell us how to worship, Tim Tebow can. If Tebow can trademark this religious pose, can the Catholic Church trademark the making of the sign of the cross? Could Muslims trademark the act of bowing towards Mecca?
Recent Blog Posts
- Producers Cited with Willful Safety Violations Following On-Set Tragedy
- Was the NFL’s Extension of Ray Rice’s Suspension Lawful?
- An Ocean Full of Pirates: The Criminal Sentencing of Internet File Sharing
- Microsoft Acquires Maker of Minecraft for $2.5 Billion
- Monday Morning JETLawg
- Internet Slowdown: Websites Protest Proposed Net Neutrality Rules
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution