- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
In September 2012, Kathleen Mangan-Valle made the uncomfortable discovery that her husband had used her computer to visit a fetish Web site. But a more devastating revelation was yet to come. With her suspicions heightened, Mangan-Valle began reviewing her husband’s recent electronic history. The search revealed that her husband, New York City Police Officer Gilberto Valle, had communicated with numerous people through e-mail and online chat rooms about his plans to kidnap, cook and eat women. In some of the communications that Mangan-Valle uncovered, Officer Valle had planned to cook and eat his own wife, his wife’s friends and former co-workers, and former classmates. Mangan-Valle reported the information to authorities.
The FBI took Officer Valle into custody on October 24, 2012. Officer Valle is now charged with conspiracy to commit kidnapping as well as accessing a federal database, the National Crime Information Center, to identify and research potential female targets. Prosecutors have built their case around hundreds of documents on Valle’s computer detailing potential victims and grisly plans of cannibalism.
Also central to the prosecution’s case are “thousands of chats and messages” in which Officer Valle communicated with dozens of others over chat rooms and by e-mail. In the online communications, Officer Valle plans to abduct, torture, cook and eat women in graphic detail. In other communications, he offers to abduct women and send them to another online user interested in cannibalism, identified as “Moody Blues,” for $6000.
But is sending and e-mail or communicating through a chat room on a fetish Web site a crime? Valle’s defense is arguing no. The defense goes on to argue that Officer Valle has committed no criminal act. The New York Times reported that at a hearing in October, Officer Valle’s attorney noted, “At worst, this is someone who has sexual fantasies . . . There is no actual crossing the line from fantasy to reality.”
The defense has taken a similar strategy at trial, which began on Monday, February 25, 2013 in Federal District Court in Manhattan. During cross-examination, FBI investigator Corey Walsh testified that Officer Valle communicated with over two dozen people regarding plots to kidnap and kill women. However, Walsh also testified that of those individuals, only three have been identified as actually involved in criminal activity. These communications are the basis for the conspiracy charges against Valle. The remaining communications have been determined to be fantasy role-play. Officer Valle’s attorneys have underscored that Valle’s allegedly criminal communications are indistinguishable from those amounting to fantasy role-play.
So, what do you think? Are Officer Valle’s e-mails and chat conversations enough to constitute a crime? Or, are communications like these merely bizarre, fantasy role-playing and not criminal at all?
Tagged with: criminal law
Recent Blog Posts
- Centralizing Cybersecurity in the Digital Age
- Justice Department Deals a Blow to Songwriters
- If You Build It, They Will Come: Baseball and the Reopening of Cuba
- First Circuit Aligns With Third: Actavis Extends Beyond Cash Settlements
- Current Issues in Technology Law: Dr. Asma Vranaki Analyzes Data Privacy Regulation in the Context of Facebook Advertisements
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Rises in National Law Journal Rankings
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution