- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Last Friday, the United States escaped with a 1-0 victory in its World Cup qualifying match against Costa Rica. But the game will be remembered less for its outcome and more for the blizzard-like conditions that engulfed Dick’s Sporting Goods Park outside of Denver, Colorado. In the 58th minute, weather conditions forced El Salvadorian referee Joel Aguilar to stop play so that crews could shovel snow off of the lines of the field. But Costa Rican soccer officials believe that Aguilar did not do enough and that instead he should have postponed the match entirely. On Sunday, the Costa Rican Football Federation filed an official match protest with FIFA.
Unfortunately for Costa Rica, the official World Cup Regulations have fairly strict procedures for filing a protest. If a team believes that the pitch’s playing surface has become unplayable during the course of the match, the rules require that “the captain of the protesting team shall immediately lodge a protest with the referee in the presence of the captain of the opposing team.” Additionally, a summary of the protest must be submitted in writing “no later than two hours after the match.” Finally, a full written report must be submitted to the FIFA general secretariat within 24 hours. If Costa Rica did not comply with these procedures, then the protest will simply be “disregarded.”
FIFA is currently analyzing whether Costa Rica followed the correct procedures, and should have a decision soon. But if FIFA determines that its procedures were not met, Costa Rica’s appeal options may be rather limited. The World Cup Regulations permit appeals to the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, Switzerland, but these appeals may not apply to match protests.
Going forward, should FIFA keep these bright-line requirements? Or should it take a more holistic, totality-of-the-circumstances approach?
Tagged with: sports
Recent Blog Posts
- Is Streaming Speech?
- Does Tweaking Your Car’s Software Constitute Fair Use?
- Controlling the Uncontrollable: UK Taking the Driver’s Seat in Driverless Car Technology
- Obama’s Cybersecurity Executive Order: Private Sector Must Help Police the “Wild West”
- Qualcomm Settlement May Reconfigure the Smartphone Market in China
- Who Rightfully Owns the Village People’s YMCA?
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution