- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Surprisingly, there may be more than one person trying to make sure you Own Your Power. Forgetting for the moment what those words may mean or how some may go about owning their power, the Second Circuit has revived the debate over who owns the right to exploit those words–for the time being.
Three years ago, Simone Kelly-Brown sued Oprah for plastering “Own Your Power” on the cover of The Oprah Magazine and subsequently hosting a corporate event with the same title. Before Oprah published that magazine or held that event, Kelly-Brown had trademarked the phrase and created a website and suite of writings centered on the idea. So, upon seeing Oprah’s use of the phrase, Kelly-Brown went to the courts.
The suit centered around Kelly-Brown’s trademark on the phrase and her ability to stop others from using the same. Kelly-Brown took the issue to the federal courts, and last year the court dismissed the case, finding that no one could confuse the source of the phrase between Oprah and Kelly-Brown. Moreover, the court further found that Oprah had a right to fair use of the phrase in labeling her magazine.
Kelly-Brown, perhaps taking hold of her Own Power, would not be denied. She appealed, and on May 31, 2013, Judge Chester Straub of the Second Circuit gave her a partial victory. Judge Straub vacated the District Court’s ruling regarding trademark infringement reviving the issue of whether Oprah overstepped her reach. In terms of legal arguments, the issue centers around the Lanham Act, which was enacted decades ago in an effort to create “a national system of trademark registration.”
The findings of the court’s lengthy opinion are a bit too numerous to outline here, but in short, the court found (PDF) Oprah’s arguments unpersuasive because she had confused “use of a trademark commerce and use as a mark.”
Ultimately, the Second Circuit remanded the case for further proceedings. So, we’ll have to wait just a bit longer to find out who Owns Your Power.
Recent Blog Posts
- Former Cardinals Executive Pleads Guilty to Hacking, But Will the Cardinals Pay the Price?
- Making a Murder – Technology in Forensic Evidence Questioned
- Is “smart gun” technology the future of gun safety?
- Why High-Profile Athletes’ Defamation Lawsuits Against Al Jazeera Are Nothing More Than a Hail Mary
- Executives of a Chinese Online Video-Sharing Service Provider Stood Trial for Internet Pornography
- The Rise of ‘Swatting’
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution