- Journal Archives
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
For years now, governments around the world have been trying to find innovative ways to curb unlawful peer-to-peer file sharing and other forms of copyright infringement. One country, which attempted to take a hard-line approach against piracy, recently decided to loosen its grip.
Just last week, the French government’s controversial “Hadopi” law was overturned. Under the law, users who were suspected of copyright infringement would be sent warnings to stop their illegal activity. If a user did not respond to the government’s final warning, the government could then cut off the user’s Internet access for up to a year.
The law received a blow a month after it was passed when France’s Constitutional Court struck down the law and ruled that access to online communications services is a human right that cannot be withheld without a judge’s intervention. The law was also said to breach the right to privacy. The French government made the requisite changes and a new law, with the same basic requirements, was put into effect.
It is interesting to see a country that sought to lead the pack against piracy with a hard-line approach decide to change its strategy so dramatically. Is this a sign that a realistic approach to developing anti-piracy laws makes more sense than an idealistic one? Is a private partnership like the Copyright Alert System even better? What approach do you think is best?
Recent Blog Posts
- Government Settles in DEA Facebook Impersonation Controversy
- Nickelodeon’s Kids v. Google
- Ivanpah Solar Plant’s Firey Clash of Environmental Objectives
- The Silk Road: An Insight Into the Future of Internet Regulation?
- JETLaw Symposium on Intellectual Property Tomorrow
- San Jose Strikes Out Again in Suit Against MLB
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution