- Journal Archives
- Volume 18
- Volume 17
- Volume 16
- Volume 15
- Volume 14
- Volume 13
- Volume 12
- Volume 11
- Volume 10
- Volume 9
- Volume 8
- Volume 7
- Volume 6
- Volume 5
- Volume 4
- Volume 3
- Volume 2
- Volume 1
Cab companies, normally at odds with each other, are banning together to combat Uber.
Uber, a ride-sharing company recently valued at $18 billion, came onto the scene in San Francisco in 2009. Five years later, the company is operating in over seventy cities worldwide. Uber is disrupting the current taxicab market with its use of cutting-edge technology platforms to connect ride-seekers with drivers and its ability to sidestep regulations, rules, and licensing requirements that cab companies must follow.
Cab companies take issue with the latter Uber-advantage; attorney John Lally, who represents the interests of cab companies operating in Prince George County, Maryland said, “This has caused us to form an alliance to make those guys play by the same rules that we have to play by.” On August 6th, the Maryland Public Service Commission ruled that Uber must follow state regulations for passenger-for-hire services and characterized Uber as a ‘common carrier’ – a small victory for cab companies. Uber, however, plans to appeal this decision claiming that it is a technology company rather than a transportation company, and plans to “continue to defend the rights of riders and drivers to have access to the safest, most reliable transportation alternatives on the road.” Maryland is the first state to classify Uber as a ‘common carrier.’
Uber has a different perspective on the cab companies’ solidarity – instead, referring to it as the ‘Big Taxi cartel.’ On August 19th Uber announced it had hired David Plouffe, Obama’s former campaign advisor, to help win a fight that it has analogized to a political campaign against the ‘Big Taxi cartel.’ Regarding his recent appointment, Plouffe said, “I look forward to doing what I can right now to ensure drivers and riders are not denied their opportunity for choice in transportation due to those who want to maintain a monopoly and play the ‘inside game’ to deny opportunity to those on the outside.”
Regardless of whether the ‘Big Taxi cartel’ wants to maintain a monopoly or the cab companies want everyone to play by the same rules, it will be interesting to see if other states will follow Maryland’s lead.
– Erin Webb
Recent Blog Posts
- Former Cardinals Executive Pleads Guilty to Hacking, But Will the Cardinals Pay the Price?
- Making a Murder – Technology in Forensic Evidence Questioned
- Is “smart gun” technology the future of gun safety?
- Why High-Profile Athletes’ Defamation Lawsuits Against Al Jazeera Are Nothing More Than a Hail Mary
- Executives of a Chinese Online Video-Sharing Service Provider Stood Trial for Internet Pornography
- The Rise of ‘Swatting’
Tagsadvertising antitrust Apple books career celebrities contracts copyright copyright infringement courts creative content criminal law entertainment Facebook FCC film/television financial First Amendment games Google government intellectual property internet JETLaw journalism lawsuits legislation media medicine Monday Morning JETLawg music NFL patents privacy progress publicity rights radio social networking sports Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) technology telecommunications trademarks Twitter U.S. Constitution