Currently viewing the tag: "35 USC 101"

GUEST POST BY: WESLEY D. MARKHAM

On March 31, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, Docket No. 13-298, where the question is whether computer-related inventions are eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. If Justice Breyer’s recent musings are any indication, things [...]

Continue Reading

Tomorrow morning, JETLaw will welcome faculty, staff, students, CLE participants, and web viewers to its 2013-2014 symposium: Patents 101: From Computer Code to Genetic Codes. The event will begin promptly at 9:00 AM on Friday, Jan. 24th, at Vanderbilt Law School, and it will focus on what, exactly, is eligible for patent protection. [...]

Continue Reading

JETLaw’s 2013-2014 symposium, Patents 101: From Computer Code to Genetic Codes, will take place next Friday, Jan. 24th, at Vanderbilt Law School. The symposium focuses on what, exactly, is eligible for patent protection. Chief Judge Randall Rader of the Federal Circuit will deliver the keynote, and panels will address software patents, [...]

Continue Reading

What Do You Think About Patent Subject Matter Eligibility?

On Friday, January 24th, JETLaw will host its symposium on patent-eligible subject matter, Patents 101: From Computer Code to Genetic Codes. (Details below.) Should courts care whether patented processes are implemented in software? Should software be considered unpatentable as an “algorithm”? Should any [...]

Continue Reading