Currently viewing the tag: "patents"

China’s anti-trust investigation of the American chip maker Qualcomm came to an end when the chip giant agreed to pay a record fine of about $975 million last Monday. According to the decision issued by China’s National Development and Reform Commission, the royalties Qualcomm collected from Chinese smartphone manufactures were “unfair” and “excessively [...]

Continue Reading

What to Expect After Teva v. Sandoz?

On February 18, 2015 By Emily Gabranski

Less than a month ago, the Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit’s en banc decision in Teva v. Sandoz, holding that the Court of Appeals must apply a “clear error” standard of review to all factual findings made in patent claim construction. The proper standard of review has been hotly debated for sometime, [...]

Continue Reading

After a series of cases holding software patents invalid in the wake of Alice v. CLS, the Federal Circuit, in DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com, encountered a set of software patents that it held to meet subject matter eligibility requirements. The patents in question were directed toward both systems and methods of generating composite [...]

Continue Reading

On July 11, the Federal Circuit released its decision in Digitech v. Electronics for Imaging, the court’s first case involving the boundaries of patent eligible subject matter under Section 101 of the Patent Act in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp v. CLS Bank. The Federal Circuit applied the [...]

Continue Reading

3D Printing. Are we ready?

On June 12, 2014 By Philip Houten

One of the most staggering innovations in the last few years is the creation and proliferation of 3D printing. From printing guns that can shoot to life saving organs, 3D printing has the ability to revolutionize the way business is done and [...]

Continue Reading

Two weeks ago the Supreme Court consented to the filing of amicus briefs in the Teva v. Sandoz case. This case will resolve the split in the Federal Circuit over the standard of review for patent claim construction. This is a good time to review the prior case law and the existing standard [...]

Continue Reading

“Google it” has become a familiar refrain for any Millennial tasked with answering a question.  The technology giant has redefined the way we obtain and process information.  Not surprisingly, the company’s intellectual property portfolio is quite valuable.  Google is continuing to add to that portfolio, seeking a patent on [...]

Continue Reading

Software Patents at the Supreme Court

On March 30, 2014 By Parker Hancock

Is software patentable? This simple question, despite over 40 years of judicial wrestling, remains unanswered. Many in the business world are hostile to software patents. After all, much of the vibrant software startup culture seems to operate just fine in an atmosphere of uncertainty. For example, just last month, Facebook acquired software startup [...]

Continue Reading

GUEST POST BY: WESLEY D. MARKHAM

On March 31, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, Docket No. 13-298, where the question is whether computer-related inventions are eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. If Justice Breyer’s recent musings are any indication, things [...]

Continue Reading

No Hugs for a Friend

On February 24, 2014 By Chastity Bobo

Four years after audiences left the theater with damp handkerchiefs and thoughts of their favorite childhood toys, Disney is embroiled in a legal battle over the rights to the huggable villain who was set on thwarting Woody and Buzz’s return to their best friend Andy in Toy Story 3. New Jersey’s Diece-Lisa Industries (DLI), which holds [...]

Continue Reading